Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DV
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime8.5 Days
Run DateAug 30 '24 at 09:58
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 62.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 216
71% 131 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 549
52% 434 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 140F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (62 fps cap detected)
50.6% Above average
Lighting 62
Reflection 62
Parallax 62
50% 62 fps
MRender 62
Gravity 62
Splatting 62
51% 62 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
300GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 992 996 997 1008 1009 578 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,062
Write 1,013
Mixed 993
SusWrite 930
225% 999 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 45.1
146% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 464
DQ Write 681
DQ Mixed 618
454% 587 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 170%
Great: 181%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$424
315GB free
Firmware: W0302B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 406 406 413 410 411 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 411
Mixed 405
SusWrite 409
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 27.9
130% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 46.1
80% 156 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 76.D305G.D390B 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.6% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 25.5
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 23.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 0R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 14% 36 70 57 120 15.5" 1280 720 NCP0036
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback