Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8665U 10,156 User benchmarks, average bench 60% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Memory 17 1-Core 20.5 2-Core 37.4 14% 25 Pts	4-Core 76.2 8-Core 103 11% 89.4 Pts	64-Core 106 6% 106 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 8549) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	3.42% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 4.4 Parallax 4.2 3% 4.13 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 3.8 Splatting 5.9 4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.42% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB 20,171 User benchmarks, average bench 174% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD70H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 656 320 326 329 325 301 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 792 Write 702 Mixed 614 SusWrite 376 139% 621 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 22.3 4K Mixed 17.6 60% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 128 97% 132 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 235%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB 44,819 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 8.2 24% 8.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 4.6 13% 4.63 GB/s	Latency 461 9% 461 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	46	26	60	14"	1280 720	AUO403D

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	2,039x
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	3x
RTX 3080Nvidia $6,437Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	3x

SSD
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	184x
SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBIntelBench 147%, 27,018 samples	127x
MTFDHBA256TCK-1AS1AABHA 256GBCrucialBench 139%, 5,621 samples	107x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	232x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	139x
RMSA3260KC78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 39%, 545 samples	90x