Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
29 mins ago, 2 mins ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '24 at 10:05
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$1,295
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 166
2-Core 326
106% 195 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1,066
98% 818 Pts
64-Core 1,492
92% 1,492 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$3,723
EVGA(3842 4755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
141% Outstanding
Lighting 205
Reflection 188
Parallax 179
167% 191 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 144
Splatting 128
121% 151 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 141%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$659
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,535
Write 2,263
Mixed 1,674
479% 2,157 MB/s
4K Read 63.3
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 85
283% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,146
DQ Write 972
DQ Mixed 1,049
789% 1,056 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$392
80GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 104 109 130 173 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 106
Write 118
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 122
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 106%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
360GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 101 104 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 145
Write 146
Mixed 20
SusWrite 104
132% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 40.4
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 32.1
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 41.8
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 104%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 240 27" 1280 720 ACR0746 XB273 GX
Typical GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P Builds (Compare 2,336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $5,615
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback